Pages

Monday, 17 November 2025

Faulkner, William "The Sound and the Fury"

Faulkner, William "The Sound and the Fury" - 1929

For the Classics Spin #42, we received #17 and this was my novel. When I revealed this to the other bloggers, I got a lot of comments that people did not like the book at all. But I was determined to like it. After all, I loved "Light in August" by the same author.

However, this is not comparable to the first of his books that I read. I think I agree with most of the other readers.

But let's get to the book.

In one of the reviews (see here), I read "I appreciated the writer's skill a lot more than I enjoyed reading the novel." I think that hits the nail on its head. Another one compared it with "Look Homeward, Angel" which I could also agree on. Another Southern US writer whom you might only want to follow, if you are a Southerner yourself.

I'm sure you guessed it, this wasn't my favourite book of the year. But I appreciated having read it.

They mention "Ulysses" in the description. As you can see, I read that and said at the time "this is the most difficult book I have ever read". It still belongs on that list but I understood that better than this one. I also said "the longer I distance myself from this novel, the more it makes sense and the bigger an impact does it have on me." I doubt this will ever happen here but one can always hope.

I did understand the actions in the book but really didn't like a single character and couldn't follow any of their decisions.

It is also says in the description that "... in the next two sections ... the novel begins to reveal itself."

Nope, not really, it was still as confusing as before. If you're not a huge fan of stream of consciousness books, I wouldn't recommend it.

From the back cover:

"Ever since the first furore was created on its publication in 1929, The Sound and the Fury has been considered one of the key novels of this century. Although it is difficult, in the same way that Ulysses is difficult, it is rewarding. Few readers can fail to become absorbed in this imaginative creation of the degenerate und disintegrating Compson family.

Faulkner does not use characters as pawns in a plot: he is interested in minds and emotions, in the interaction of characters and the way incidents and events affect individuals and their relationships. This is done by dividing the novel into four sections: the first is 'told by an idiot' - Benjy, for whom time does not exist. It is in the next two sections, when the reader hears the tale told by Benjy's two brothers, that the novel begins to reveal itself.

In essence this is a novel about lovelessness - 'only an idiot has no grief; only a fool would forget it. What else is there in this world sharp enough to stick to your guts?' It is a novel about intense and passionate family relationships wherein there is no love, only self-centredness.

The cover shows a detail from 'The Scarecrow' by Andrew Wyeth in the National Collection of Fine Arts, Washington."

William Faulkner received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1949 "for his powerful and artistically unique contribution to the modern American novel."

I contribute to this page: Read the Nobels and you can find all my blogs about Nobel Prize winning authors and their books here.

Here are all the books on my original Classics Club list.
And here is a list of all the books I read with the Classics Spin.

10 comments:

  1. sorry it didn't work for you.
    I often have a hard time with stream of consciousness AND with dysfunctional families, but I so enjoyed this book!: https://wordsandpeace.com/2022/10/25/book-review-the-sound-and-the-fury/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're probably right, it might be more the dysfunctional family than the stream of consciousness. Thanks for that, Emma. And I hope some people will visit your post because that is a good one.

      Delete
  2. I'm not a huge fan of Faulkner, and have never tried to read this one. And your review makes me think I'm not missing out too much. Kudos to you though for finishing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read similar comments when I announced this was going to be my book. So, I am glad that I am not the only one. You know how much I usually like classics. Thanks, Lark.

      Delete
  3. I think I tried to read this one after visiting his home in Oxford, Mississippi. I am sure I didn't finish it so I admire your perseverance and positive attitude!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Constance. I have to smile that so many agree with me.

      Delete
  4. I don't remember what I read by him (for my college Southern Fiction class, maybe The Reivers), but I recall not finishing it. It was supposed to be funny, but it wasn't. Well, I tried... I won't bother trying again. As they say, once burnt, twice shy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same here, Davida. I don't think I'll read another of his books, even though I have enjoyed Light in August. But there are sooo many other great authors.

      Delete
  5. I am not surprised. I have only read one book by him, and started a second which I stopped reading rather quickly. I don't like the way he writes. Although, trying to be open towards classics, and writers with a different style, I would like to try out another book. On the other hand, there are so many good books out there so why waste your time with books you don't like?
    Although, trying to read a full set of classics, I am even thinking of reading Middlemarsh ... can you imagine? Although, I know most people love it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That might be a reason I didn't like him, either, Lisbeth. If you want to try another one, try "The Light in August". I liked that one.
      And Middlemarch is also a great read, I am sure you will enjoy it. I know you like the Brontës and Jane Austen. George Eliot is also great, another female writer. Though, I think Anthony Trollope also belongs to that category. The Warden etc. (Barchester Chronicles) are my favourite there.

      Delete