Friday, 3 April 2026

Spell the Month in Books ~ April 2026

 
Reviews from the Stacks

I found this on one of the blogs I follow, Books are the New Black who found it at One Book More. It was originally created by Reviews from the Stacks, and the idea is to spell the month using the first letter of book titles.

April: 
Easter OR Pastel Covers

Hmmm, I don't have any books about Easter, I'm not the biggest fan of books with pastel covers, they are often too "light" for me. But I have a few, of course.

APRIL
A
Ruiz Zafón, Carlos "The Angel's Game" (E: El juego del ángel) - 2008
P
Mahfouz, Naguib "Palace Walk" (arab: بين القصرين/Bayn al-qasrayn) - 1956
R
Shakespeare, William "Romeo and Juliet" - 1597
I
Hislop, Victoria "The Island" - 2005


* * *

Happy Reading!

📚 📚 📚

13 comments:

  1. LOVED seeing 'Romeo & Juliet' live on stage. MAGICAL. The production I saw was 'modernised' (complete with a disco & GUNS) but used the standard Shakespearian language. Although I still remember the shock when one of the characters pulled out a pistol and SHOT the other one! The whole audience jumped out of their seats! Including ME. [lol]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, that sounds great. I love modernised classics, even Shakespeare. Must have been fantastic. Thanks for that story, Kitten.

      Delete
  2. I loved The Angel's Game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So did I, Lark. Of course, it was the continuation of The Shadow of the Wind, and that series is one of my favourite series ever.

      Delete
  3. Eleanor and I saw the Broadway show & Juliet a couple weeks ago and absolutely loved it. Eleanor was so furious when she found out Romeo was in his mid-twenties and Juliet only 13 or so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Juliet was definitely 13 - it says so in the text. Romeo's age is never specified but its estimated somewhere between 16-21.

      Delete
    2. She is definitely right, Sarah. Things were different back then, of course, but that doesn't mean it was right.
      Thanks for the explanation, Kitten.

      Delete
    3. This was interesting from Wiki: Even Capulet tries to encourage Count Paris, a wealthy suitor, to wait a little longer before even thinking of marrying his daughter, feeling that she is still too young; "She hath not seen the change of fourteen years, Let two more summers wither in their pride, Ere we may think her ripe to be a bride".

      So it seems that 16 was considered the earliest reasonable age for marriage. Yet again though there's no mention of what is considered a suitable age *difference*.

      Delete
    4. Well, age difference was even more normal back then. You see that not only in many classic books but also when looking at history. The girls married at a young age but the guys had to wait to be able to support a family first. Or "sow their oats". Phh!

      Delete
    5. I totally agree with you, Sarah.

      Delete